Ratifio vs DocuSign
DocuSign dominates general-purpose e-signatures, but its compliance capabilities are bolted on — available only on the highest tiers, configured through enterprise sales, and documented in PDFs you have to request from your account manager. Ratifio was built from day one for organisations where a regulator can ask 'prove this signature is valid' and you need an answer that's more robust than 'here's a certificate of completion'.
Signing infrastructure purpose-built for regulated industries
Enterprise Agreement Cloud for every kind of agreement
DocuSign pricing typically requires annual commitments and per-user fees. Here's what Ratifio offers instead.
For regulated teams getting started with e-signatures
For organisations with regulatory reporting obligations
For financial services, healthcare, and government
Every action is logged with IP address, user agent, ISO 8601 timestamp, and document hash. Consent text recorded verbatim. Not a summary — the actual evidence trail your regulator expects.
Financial regulators expect 7 years. Healthcare expects 8-10. Ratifio stores documents and audit trails for the full retention period with immutable logs and automated retention management.
SHA-256 hash at upload, recorded before signing begins. Any modification to the document after upload is cryptographically detectable. This isn't a feature — it's the architecture.
REST API, webhooks, bulk operations, and white-label embedding. Ratifio fits into your existing compliance stack. Integrate with your GRC platform, case management system, or internal workflow.
DocuSign works for general business signing. When your regulator asks for evidence — specific IP addresses, exact consent text, cryptographic proof of document integrity — you need infrastructure that was designed for that question from the start. That's Ratifio.
Request a compliance review